Big Bridge: A Response
Out by Gloria Frym
Ms. Frym,
In reading your poem Out, it seemed to me that the word itself carried so much of the work's meaning, as if the lines sprung naturally from that central idea. Out is an imperative statement, expelling something, and so too implying a personal liberation of the self. This is a complex notion, in that one could both expel something in order to find freedom, or find 'freedom' in the expulsion of the self. And these two possibilities rule the poem, one passing into the other and back again seemlessly till one seems much the same as the other.
In either case, the reader is presented with strange thoughts in a startling, singular moment. In a power outage, one often finds deep-seated thoughts coming to the surface, things usually submerged and hidden away. In that flickering candlelight, the world takes on a different hue, colored by recollections. Holidays are similar, moments frozen in time. In these moments of half-realized self, when history and present sentiment blend into wistful consideration of the 'tarnished platter', a secret self emerges. The possibility is there to shine the self and world into a wondrous luster, and the reader is eager to keep that possibility and flickering candle flame from being doused.
But this is a different self encompassed by the candle's flame, an illuminated self that belongs to a different place, a different world removed from war and the busy exertions of a typical day; this is a creature of halfways and dreams. As the power returns, this self retreats back inside, and the world begins to turn anew, busy and buzzing with electricity. The world turns, but should not one be still remain wistful?
This seems the point of the poem, a pensive thought and encouraging need to recall something of a half-remembered self, something reserved for holidays and the occational coincidence. But what is expelled or maintained, and which freedom is sweeter, that of self-awareness or self-denial?

